Totalitarianism is inherently, not just contingently, connected to modernity

Evidence

In respect of administrative resources, tendencies towards increasing democratic involvement have as their dark side possibilities for the creation of totalitarian power. The intensifying of surveillance operations provides many avenues of democratic involvement, but also makes possible the sectional control of political power, bolstered by monopolistic access to the means of violence, as an instrument of terror. Totalitarianism and modernity are not just contingently, but inherently, connected, as Zygmunt Bauman in particular has made clear. — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 401

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly parallels Giddens’s thesis that surveillance and trust in expert systems produce totalitarian potential — the same institutional power Stevens defers to in The Remains of the Day. — connects to: Totalitarianism concentrates state powers in ways traditional despotism could not — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 31; Modern capitalist societies experience themselves as pluralistic rather than unified; Both nature’s mechanism and history’s determinism oppress the modern self — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 163 (+14 more)
  • DEFINE: Clarifies the inherent link between modernity’s administrative resources and totalitarian possibility.

Broader Connections