Totalitarian rule dispenses with the consensus iuris that constitutes a people.

Evidence

A given number of individuals, therefore, can be society to a greater or lesser degree, just as a given number of sounds can be music to a greater or lesser degree. Society as a form presents the ideality of a world awaiting actualization in history. β€” Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 51 (#qualifies, via linked claim)

That totalitarian movements depended less on the structurelessness of a mass society than on the specific conditions of an atomized and individualized mass, can best be seen in a comparison of Nazism and Bolshevism which began in their respective countries under very different circumstances. To change Lenin’s revolutionary dictatorship into full totalitarian rule, Stalin had first to create artificially that atomized society which had been prepared for the Nazis in Germany by historical circumstances. β€” Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 761 (#complicates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Totalitarian rule requires an atomized and individualized mass, not mere social structurelessness β€” Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 761; A set of individuals can be society to varying degrees. β€” Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 51

Broader Connections