Torture’s ambiguous truth makes it a potent propaganda weapon for both sides

Evidence

The resort to torture poses moral problems that are just as germane to the world today as they were to the period under consideration. As Jean-Paul Sartre wrote in 1958, “Torture is neither civilian nor military, nor is it specifically French: it is a plague infecting our whole era.” But what is immediately of importance here is the influence, or influences, brought to bear by it upon the subsequent course of the Algerian war. And these were very potent indeed. It is one of the most difficult things in this world to establish the truth about torture; whether it did or did not take place, and the nature and scale of it. The plaintiff is as unlikely to tell the unadorned truth as his oppressor; for it is so superlative a propaganda weapon given into his hands. — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 580

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s through-line of how French revolutionary/colonial ideology was fought back — torture as the weapon that turned French public opinion and international legitimacy. — connects to: Torture proved a boomerang weapon that undermined the power using it; Truth serum torture destroys victims’ capacity to distinguish true from false; Contradictory research findings enabled both sides to weaponize evidence selectively — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 9551 (+5 more)
  • QUESTION: What precisely was the influence of torture exposure on the subsequent course of the Algerian war — did it galvanize anti-war sentiment in France?

Broader Connections