Those who read unfavorable group history become less willing to apologize

Evidence

For the measure of collective guilt, the only significant effect was a main effect of identification; low identifiers scored higher on collective guilt scale than did high identifiers. For the measure of willingness to apologize, there was again a main effect of identification; low identifiers expressed greater agreement than high identifiers with the idea of making a group apology. There was also a main effect of the history manipulation on willingness to apologize; those participants who read the unfavorable passage were less likely to agree with the idea of apologizing than were those who read the other two versions. Finally, Protestants’ agreement that their group should apologize for past wrongs was mediated by their feelings of collective guilt for these past actions. — Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Collective Guilt, 1358

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Escalating conflict reduces in-group acknowledgment of past wrongdoings — Sonia Roccas and Yechiel Klar and Ido Liviatan, The Paradox of Group-Based Guilt: Modes…, 130; Reading about in-group atrocities suppresses concern for harm and fairness — Roderick M. Kramer, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, Robert W. Livingston, Social Cognition, Social Identity, and…, 2135; Conflict escalation lowers group-based guilt and raises exonerating cognitions over time. — Sonia Roccas and Yechiel Klar and Ido Liviatan, The Paradox of Group-Based Guilt: Modes…, 87

Broader Connections