The “cannibal” label classified which natives would submit to colonial rule

Evidence

In offi- cial missives the terms “Gayo” and “Acehnese” were distinguished in some accounts, but used interchangeably in others. How did Valck and his fellow reporters know how to tell a Gayo thief in the night from an Acehnese dissident? As we shall see, these terms often served to mark not ethnic identity but the degree of threat to this new colonial enterprise, those whose actions were to be classified as “common criminal” or “insurgent rebel.” — Ann Laura Stoler, Along the Archival Grain_ Epistemic…, 1100 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Cannibal fiction legitimized European colonial territorial conquest; Colonial moral epithets encoded specific class and racial transgressions; Colonial ethnic labels measured threat level rather than actual ethnicity — Ann Laura Stoler, Along the Archival Grain_ Epistemic…, 1100 (+6 more)

Broader Connections