The US Supreme Court’s Milliken ruling barred suburban-wide desegregation remedies

Evidence

In 1974, another important lawsuit—Milliken v. Bradley—was ïŹled against the Governor of Michigan. The suit charged “that the Detroit, Michigan public school system was racially segregated as a result of ofïŹcial policies.” A district court reviewed the case ïŹnding that the system was in fact segregated, and ordered the adoption of a plan that would desegregate outlying school districts (U.S. Supreme Court Oyez; retrieved on July 24, 2010 from www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1973/1973_73_ 434). The case was appealed and ïŹnally decided in the Supreme Court. In a 5–4 decision the Supreme Court stated that there was “no showing of signiïŹcant violation by the 53 outlying school districts,” thus afïŹrming segregation and dooming the Detroit school children and others in urban centers like it to inadequate education. — Rebecca A. Martusewicz, Jeff Edmundson, and John Lupinacci, EcoJustice Education, 1186

Categorization

  • XREF: Instrumental-instituions thread of the polyad; court ruling produced enduring segregated geography rather than undoing it. — connects to: Suburban segregation was reframed as de facto and thus survived legal challenge — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of
, 28; The 1974 Milliken ruling blocked metropolitan desegregation by barring interdistrict busing. — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial
, 3035; The Supreme Court obstructed Fourteenth Amendment rights for black Americans (+1 more)

Broader Connections