The UN poverty rapporteur condemned human rights NGOs for neglecting economic inequality

Evidence

Extreme economic inequality should be seen as ‘a cause of shame on the part of the international human rights movement’, Alston argued. Moreover, he charged that major human rights organisations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, had been deeply reluctant to factor questions of distribution and resources into their advocacy, and consequently the deep structures that perpetuate such inequalities have been left untouched. While reprimanding the human rights NGOs for their failure to address social and economic rights, Alston also argued against conflating these ‘lop-sided and counter-productive institutional choices’ with the structure of human rights law. Economic and social rights are a key part of that structure, he contended, even if they are often treated as ‘minor league discussions’ by human rights NGOs, and the United States has spent several decades trying to undermine them. — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market, 442

Categorization

  • SEED: Angle for an article: how major human-rights NGOs structurally avoid distribution/resource questions, and what Alston’s ‘minor league discussions’ charge means for market-ethics debates.
  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s goal of linking human-rights discourse with economic-policy debate — this is the pivotal contemporary case. — connects to: Modern human rights NGOs narrowed their agenda to civil liberties under neoliberal ascendancy — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights…, 148; Humanitarian NGOs like LSF emerged partly to discredit Third Worldist economic critique — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights…, 394; Humanitarian NGOs helped shift blame for poverty onto Third World states. — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights…, 381 (+3 more)

Broader Connections