The Supreme Court ruled religious accommodation duties apply even without explicit requests

Evidence

Almost seven years after she was first denied employment by Abercrombie & Fitch, on June 1, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in favor of Samantha Elauf, finding that “an employer may not refuse to hire an applicant if the employer was motivated by avoiding the need to accommodate a religious practice.” — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global…, 437

Categorization

• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global…, 437
• XREF: connects to: The European Court of Justice allowed religious-symbol bans only if applied generally — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global…, 458

Broader Connections

• The European Court of Justice allowed religious-symbol bans only if applied generally #corroborates (0.60) — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global…, 458