The southern ruling class redirected white labor’s anger onto Blacks.

Evidence

But it was not merely a matter of the antagonisms of the poor whites against the Blacks being revitalized by the prominence assumed by the latter during the Reconstruction. The “deep economic foundation” for these antagonisms was in fact being challenged by proposals to radically alter land tenure put forward by Black legislators. Rather, it was the remnants of the southern ruling class that focused the attention of poor whites on to the Black workers. The ruling class had been so weakened by the war that for the first time it was forced to aggressively recruit poor whites as its allies. “The masters feared their former slaves… . They lied about the Negroes… . They forestalled the danger of a united Southern labor movement by appealing to the fear and hate of white labor… . They encouraged them to ridicule Negroes and beat them, kill and burn their bodies. The planters even gave the poor whites their daughters in marriage” (p. 633). — Cedric J. Robinson, Black Marxism_ The Making of the Black…, 1087

Categorization

• XREF: The ruling-class-divide-and-rule analysis parallels the poor white versus Negro antagonism theme and the later white labor recruitment into whiteness — echoes Du Bois’s argument in Black Reconstruction. — connects to: Southern whites framed busing as punishing their legitimate hard work — Matthew D. Lassiter, The Suburban Origins of “Color-Blind”…, 4
• SHARE: The detail that planters even gave poor whites their daughters in marriage as a class alliance gesture is a striking concrete tip worth sharing with anyone studying the politics of Reconstruction.