The secure multitude is measured only against the feared enemy

Evidence

Nor is it the joining together of a finall number of men, that gives them this security; because in small numbers, small additions on the one side or the other, make the advantage of strength so great, as is sufficient to carry the Victory; and therefore gives encouragement to an Invasion. The Multitude sufficient to confide in for our Security, is not determined by any certain number, but by comparison with the Enemy we feare; and is then sufficient, when the odds of the Enemy is not of so visible and conspicuous moment, to determine the event ofWarre, as to move him to attempt. (ch. q, n8) As Hobbes goes on to make clear, nothing is less certain, less permanent, than such a victory. — Gil Anidjar, The Jew, the Arab, 369 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Sufficient defensive numbers are set only by comparison with the feared enemy — Gil Anidjar, The Jew, the Arab: A History of the…, 369; An ambiguous, unconcretized threat fragments rather than unites a crowd. — John Drury and Evangelos Ntontis, A SOCIAL IDENTITY MODEL OF COLLECTIVE…, 27; Secure coalition size is defined relatively against the fearing enemy, not absolutely. (+1 more)

Broader Connections

• Sufficient defensive numbers are set only by comparison with the feared enemy #expands (0.97) — Gil Anidjar, The Jew, the Arab, 369
• Secure coalition size is defined relatively against the fearing enemy, not absolutely. #corroborates (0.96)