The rhetoric of shared sacrifice operates ideologically without requiring belief

Evidence

Individuals need not consciously “believe” in sacrifice for a sacrificial logic to be at work in citizenship remade by neoliberal rationality. Rather, the very notion of “shared sacrifice” interpellates and binds us as a citizenry — this is how the “sharing” works across extreme and obscene differences in how the sacrifice is experienced. — Wendy Brown, Undoing the Demos, 726

Categorization

  • SEED: A usable essay angle: how Althusserian interpellation survives the death of ideology in post-ideological liberal discourse — ‘shared sacrifice’ as a ritual that constitutes rather than describes a citizenry.
  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s published piece on sacrifice (‘On Sacrifice: The Real Kind, with Corpses’) — this passage extends the sacrificial logic from ritual death to everyday austerity discourse. — connects to: Workers rejected wartime ‘equality of sacrifice’ rhetoric as hollow — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 201; Communitarian moral rhetoric masks a project of disciplining individuals; Liberal-rationalist rhetoric can normalize torture as a managed procedure — Peter Morey, Islamophobia and the Novel, 371 (+7 more)

Broader Connections