The Replacement logic makes any moderate immigration position an accusation target

Evidence

Believers in the Great Replacement theory hold that minority groups know that they cannot numerically supplant or defeat the majority white society, so their goal is to dilute or weaken it by advocating for as much immigration from non-white groups as possible. Thus, anyone who takes anything less than the hardest possible line on immigration can be accused of working to further the Great Replacement conspiracy theory. — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global…, 123

Categorization

• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global…, 123
• XREF: connects to: Ordinary immigration violations are routinely relabeled as terrorism charges — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 455; Immigration agents presumed Middle Easterners Muslim and therefore unassimilable — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 179

Related

• Ordinary immigration violations are routinely relabeled as terrorism charges (similarity 0.82)

Broader Connections

• Ordinary immigration violations are routinely relabeled as terrorism charges #expands (0.60) — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 455
• Immigration agents presumed Middle Easterners Muslim and therefore unassimilable #exemplifies (0.50) — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 179