The Religious Right’s religious-freedom framing masked its defense of segregation

Evidence

Weyrich and other founders of the Religious Right cannily sought to shift the justification for their political activism away from a defense of racial segregation and toward a putative defense of religious freedom, all the while ignoring the fact that religious institutions were free to pursue whatever racial policies they chose—so long as they surrendered their tax exemptions. Indeed, the most obvious, commonsense reading of the Religious Right is that conservative evangelicals were mobilizing in defense of racial segregation. Weyrich’s sleight of hand brilliantly shifted perceptions of the movement away from racism toward a more high-minded defense of religious freedom. — Randall Balmer, Bad Faith, 112

Categorization

  • SEED: Direct article/essay candidate: the rhetorical technology of reframing a losing racist cause as a principled freedom fight, and how ‘freedom’ talk laundered it.
  • XREF: Ties to Loewen-style ‘lost cause’/manufactured grievance framing, and to the broader pattern of freedom-language masking domination seen elsewhere in my reading. — connects to: Segregationist schools’ tax-exemption fight catalyzed the New Right movement — Katherine Stewart, The Power Worshippers: Inside the…, 251; Church, media moguls, and politicians formed a mutually reinforcing segregationist power system — Robert P. Jones, White Too Long: The Legacy of White…, 124; The Religious Right’s origins lay in defending racial segregation, not opposing abortion — Randall Balmer, Bad Faith: Race and the Rise of the…, 140 (+10 more)

Broader Connections