The public sphere is defined by shared topics and editorial quality, not participation parity

Evidence

What is constitutive for the public sphere is not the disparity between active and passive participation in discourse, but rather the topics that deserve shared interest, as well as the professional processing and rationality of the contributions that promote mutual understanding about shared and diverse interests. … And this expectation concerning the reliability, quality and general relevance of public contributions is also constitutive for perceptions of the inclusive character of a public sphere that is supposed to direct the attention of all citizens to the same topics, in order to stimulate each of them to make their own judgements in accordance with the recognized standards about the issues of relevance for political decision-making. — Jürgen Habermas, A New Structural Transformation of the…, 44

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Clarifies the constitutive criteria of the public sphere — topic relevance and processed rationality — against a common misreading that participation equality is what matters.
  • XREF: Flags the enduring role of editorial sluices, connecting to the 1962 classic and later deliberative-democracy debates about mediated vs. face-to-face deliberation. — connects to: The public sphere collapses when the public becomes a statistical artifact — James W. Carey, Communication as Culture- Essays on…, 647; Public opinion forms only through discussion, not correct representations — James W. Carey, Communication as Culture- Essays on…, 372; The popular is defined by relations of power, not by a fixed content (+3 more)

Broader Connections