The popular is defined relationally by opposition to elite culture, not by its contents

Evidence

We can’t simply collect into one category all the things which ā€œthe peopleā€ do, without observing that the real analytic distinction arises, not from the list itself—an inert category of things and activities—but from the key opposition: the people/not of the people. That is to say, the structuring principle of ā€œthe popularā€ in this sense is the tensions and oppositions between what belongs to the central domain of elite or dominant culture, and the culture of the ā€œperiphery.ā€ It is this opposition which constantly structures the domain of culture into the ā€œpopularā€ and the ā€œnon-popular.ā€ — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 1010

Categorization

Category: Definitional Content

  • DEFINE: Central definition of ā€˜the popular’ as a relational structuring principle rather than a descriptive inventory.
  • XREF: Relational definition parallels Bourdieu’s field theory of cultural distinction, and Saussurean structuralist value.

Broader Connections