The origin of a speculative proposition is a void, never a presence

Evidence

But at this place of return, the reader finds nothing. As the origin was never there the first time, the reader cannot discover any substantial presence or substratum waiting to be identified. The only thing that can be followed is the sheer movement of retrocession itself, a return that moves on, finding at its own back the drive to advance. Turning back to the original point at which all the forms had been presented, the reader is at the same time projected in advance: required to give form. Plunged into the void of the proposition, the reader is brought to formulate new propositions in return. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 1217

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: The claim that the grounding origin is structurally empty — that retrocession finds nothing but the drive to advance — is a dense, paradigm-shifting point central to the whole book’s argument about plasticity.
  • XREF: Directly connects to Malabou’s core thesis that the absolute (and hence brain plasticity) must be understood as giving form to what has no fixed substratum — the empty origin as drive. — connects to: Reading a speculation means joining the proposition’s backward movement toward its origin — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 1216; Nothingness grounds negation by being itself a negation, not an empty void — Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness: An Essay on…, 215; Essence is a reified nothingness that knowledge neither adds nor removes — Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness: An Essay on…, 613 (+1 more)

Broader Connections