The Neumann-Pollock dispute was largely terminological rather than substantive.

Evidence

Neumann’s analysis of the relations between the party, the state, the armed forces and the economy made it clear that his differences of opinion with Pollock were basically quibbles about words. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 310

Categorization

• XREF: Ties directly to the earlier contrast between Pollock’s state-capitalism thesis and Neumann’s Behemoth analysis of party, state, army, and economy. — connects to: Legal critique often masks a disagreement over underlying value judgments. — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 451
• yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Legal critique often masks a disagreement over underlying value judgments. — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 451