The inner life depends on collective institutions that give it language

Evidence

For the inner life was not in the heads of people who invented its language on their own; rather, it was in the world and in us at the same time. It required individuals who formulated shared concepts that everyone could understand and make their own and that would express what they felt inside. Without institutions dedicated to the inner life there would not, socially speaking, be an inner life. The inner life was the product of an act of collective creation, which provided a social context within which it might reside. — Alain Ehrenberg, The Weariness of the Self, 530

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: Reverses the intuition that interiority is private and pre-social; argues subjectivity is institutionally manufactured.
  • QUESTION: Follow-up: what are the modern equivalents of the magazine ‘institutions of interiority,’ and what happens when they fragment into algorithmic feeds?
  • XREF: connects to: Neurosis gave ordinary people a language for their suffering. — Alain Ehrenberg, The Weariness of the Self: Diagnosing…, 262; The modern self experiences suffering without naming a specific cause. — Alain Ehrenberg, The Weariness of the Self: Diagnosing…, 174; Society presupposes a harmony between its structure and individual inner callings — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 191 (+9 more)

Broader Connections