The Incarnation and Christ’s death are Hegel’s model for God’s genuine self-alienation as otherness

Evidence

Recalling Luther, the concept of EntĂ€ußerung in Hegel continues to designate the ‘divine sacriïŹce’. However, he interprets this sacriïŹce as God’s genuine ‘becoming other’, and this justiïŹes the French translation of this concept by ‘aliĂ©nation’. In the Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, Hegel indicates that the act whereby the Son, ‘having come into the world’, acquiring his determination as ‘Other’ – an act brought to its fulïŹlment by his death –, is understood as the work of EntĂ€ußerung. The Incarnation is ‘the alienation of the divine (EntĂ€ußerung des Göttlichen)’, and Death, the ‘alterity of the divine (Anderswerden des Göttlichen)’. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 682

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Precisely specifies what EntĂ€ußerung means for Hegel: God genuinely becoming other, not merely sacrificing — the theological etymology driving Malabou’s plasticity concept.
  • XREF: This is the theological root of plasticity: God being able to give form to himself and receive it back, extended later to the brain’s self-alienation in work on neural plasticity. — connects to: Neither classical art nor Christological incarnation fully embodies spirit for Hegel; Hegel maps Incarnation, Death, and Resurrection onto the S-P-U syllogism of determinate being. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,
, 670; Christ’s death is the painful negative identification of sensuous existence with divine universality. (+7 more)

Broader Connections