The human organism’s default preferences produce self-damage

Evidence

We can now see why becoming inhuman is in the best interests of humanity. The human organism is set up to produce misery. What we like may be damaging for us. What feels good may poison us. — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk, 2332

Categorization

  • BMF: The claim that the organism is wired to reject its own good strongly echoes the aphorism in Zamyatin’s ‘We’ where happiness and freedom are posed as mutually exclusive — both imagine a humanity whose default circuitry must be rewired against itself.
  • DEEPTHINKING: ‘What we like may be damaging for us’ is a dense, counterintuitive thesis worth sitting with, spanning biopolitics, addiction discourse, and Spinozist ethics in three lines.
  • XREF: connects to: The body-politic metaphor made tyranny a self-injury of the organism — Carolyn Merchant, The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology,…, 340; Rejecting egoistic preference ordering can rest on non-selfish reasons like self-defense and group obligations — Diego Gambetta, Trust - Making and Breaking Cooperative…, 139; Moralistic self-denial weakens and coarsens the capacity for immediate pleasure — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 738 (+6 more)

Broader Connections