The guillotine aimed to punish a juridical abstraction rather than a pain-feeling body

Evidence

The guillotine, first used in March 1792, was the perfect vehicle for these principles. Death was reduced to a visible, but instantaneous event. Contact between the law, or those who carry it out, and the body of the criminal, is reduced to a split second. There is no physical confrontation; the executioner need be no more than a meticulous watchmaker. … It is intended to apply the law not so much to a real body capable of feeling pain as to a juridical subject, the possessor, among other rights, of the right to exist. It had to have the abstraction of the law itself. — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 48

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s core thesis: the telescreen in 1984 applies law/surveillance to an abstracted subject, not a flesh-and-blood body — same juridical-subject abstraction Orwell dramatizes. — connects to: The reformed penalty shifted its target from the body to subtler suffering — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 43; Penalty operates through the idea of pain, not pain itself — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 155; Modern punishment targets the soul rather than the body — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 55 (+4 more)
  • DEFINE: Foucault defines the juridical subject as the abstraction the modern penalty addresses, contrasted with the pain-capable body of the old regime.

Broader Connections