The good versus bad Muslim label tracks support for US empire rather than facts.

Evidence

In Chapters 4 and 5, I study the foreign policy establishment and its attitudes toward the “Islamic threat.” Chapter 4 discusses the shifting, zigzagging attitudes toward “good” and “bad” Muslims, Arabs, Iranians, and Afghans. These constructions are the product of imperial ethnocentric racism because the good/bad designation flows from whether one supports or opposes US policy and empire. Moreover, one can easily go from “good” to “bad.” — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 87

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to Mahmood Mamdani’s ‘Good Muslim, Bad Muslim’ thesis. — connects to: Good and bad Muslim designations follow support for US empire — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 87; US policy treated Islam as good or bad depending on imperial alignment — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 395; Muslims are judged good or bad by loyalty to the US, not piety. — Evelyn Alsultany, Arabs and Muslims in the Media: Race…, 110 (+5 more)
  • SEED: An essay on how ‘good Muslim’ status is contingent and revocable could trace the good-to-bad shifts of specific figures like Karzai, Morsi, or Erdogan against shifts in US policy.

Broader Connections