The Frankfurt School deliberately censored Marxist terminology to appease American Jewish sponsors

Evidence

The usual practice of the Institute, self-censorship viewed as a matter of strategy, continued. Horkheimer and Adorno, for example, suggested replacing expressions such as Marxism', socialization’ and means of production' with others such as socialism’, nationalization' and industrial apparatus’ in the copy of a paper which was to be presented to the AJC. This was already a softening of the suggestion made by the New York office to omit completely a paragraph intended to make it clear that fascist propaganda was not combating Marxist theory at all but merely a phantom it had dreamt up. And if they still have reservations even after these changes have been made,' Adorno wrote to the secretary in New York in connection with the suggestions which had been made, let them go ahead and cut: we don’t want to bear the responsibility.’ — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 1551

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the Institute’s material dependence on the AJC, paralleling how funding shapes intellectual output discussed elsewhere in the book and in critical theory more broadly. — connects to: The Frankfurt School self-censored its Marxist vocabulary for American approval — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1722; Horkheimer censored democratic language from the student study for fear of funders — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 2355; Exiled Frankfurt School members found American social anti-Semitism worse than German — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History…, 2152 (+4 more)
  • ADDENDUM: Relevant to the sacrifice theme as an institutional-strategic analogue: intellectual integrity quietly sacrificed to secure patron funding.

Broader Connections