The forest held opposite symbolic meanings for colonizers and colonized Kenyans

Evidence

In the dominant colonial literature about Mau Mau (political tracts, memoirs, and fiction), the forest appears as a place beyond reach of civilization, a place of atavistic savagery where ā€œterroristsā€ banded together to perform degenerate rites of barbarism. For those Kenyans who sought an end to their colonial subjugation, the forest represented something else entirely: it was a place of cultural regeneration and political refusal, a proving ground where resistance fighters pledged oaths of unity, above all, an oath to reclaim, by force if necessary, their people’s stolen land. — Rob Nixon, Slow Violence and the Environmentalism…, 387

Categorization

  • XREF: Mirrors the land/place and settler-colonial threads of the eco-justice polyad; the same ground read as ā€˜savage’ or ā€˜refuge’ parallels extraction-versus-vernacular landscape maps in ch4. — connects to: Colonialism systematically dispossesses the colonized of resources under a justifying discourse of hierarchy — Nick Couldry & Ulises A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection: How Data Is…, 246; Colonial representations of natives contained their opposite readings from first contact. — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2: Identity…, 628

Broader Connections