The doppelganger confusion was initially understood as a digital avatar-swapping artifact

Evidence

There was another reason I didn’t bother much with correcting the record for the first few years of my doppelganger trouble: with the exception of the Manhattan bathroom incident, getting confused with Naomi Wolf appeared to be a social media thing. My friends and colleagues knew who I was, and when I interacted with people I didn’t know in the physical world, her name did not come up; neither were we entangled in articles or book reviews. I therefore filed away Naomi confusion in the category of ā€œthings that happen on the internet that are not quite realā€ (back when we were silly enough to do that about all kinds of things). I told myself that I was not being confused with Wolf, but that our digital avatars were getting mistakenly swapped—the thumbnail-sized photos of us, and the tiny boxes that prescribed the parameters of our speech on those platforms, just as they flattened and blurred so much else. — Naomi Klein, Doppelganger, 85

Categorization

  • XREF: The ā€˜digital avatars flattened and blurred’ framing connects to the broader literature on algorithmic identity and the way platforms collapse users into categories — same territory as the Milgrom/Richman work on information systems.