The dialectic neutralized a prior historical discourse of race struggle

Evidence

Foucault calls this historico-political discourse on conquest “historicism,” and thus picks up, either directly or indirectly, the thesis formulated, in a very different context and for very different purposes, in 1936 by Friedrich Meinecke in his Die Entstehung des Historismus. This is a discourse of struggles, a discourse of battles, and a discourse of races. In the nineteenth century, the “dialectic” appears to have coded, and therefore “neutralized,” these struggles. — Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended, 298

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines Foucault’s historiographical sense of ‘historicism’ as a discourse of conquest, battle, and race, distinct from Meinecke’s philosophical formulation.
  • XREF: Connects to Said’s Orientalism and later critical-theory readings where a discourse is coded and neutralized — the mechanism by which race-struggle history was absorbed. — connects to: Marx derived the idea of class struggle from race-struggle historiography — Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended, 2457; Class struggle derives historically from the earlier discourse of race struggle — Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended, 96; The perception of war between races predates class struggle and religious racism — Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended, 104 (+3 more)

Broader Connections