The culture-clash argument structurally replicates terra nullius denial of indigenous claims.

Evidence

Similar in structure to claims of terra nullius in British colonial law, where the land belonged to Europeans because its original inhabitants were simply not modern enough, Chesler’s employment of culture clash provides the foundation for her central argument. To attack Israel, and the twin towers, is to mount ‘a direct hit on democracy, modernity, religious pluralism, and women’s rights.’ Stuck in pre-modernity, Palestinians can have no claim to Palestine. If America supports Israel, it is because Jews and Americans share similar cultural values; both represent the force of modernity and both must confront the menace of Islam. — Sherene Razack, Casting Out, 227 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: The culture clash argument functions as a modern terra nullius, denying Palestinian land claims.; Culture clash arguments mirror colonial terra nullius doctrine against Palestinians — Sherene Razack, Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims…, 227

Broader Connections

• The culture clash argument functions as a modern terra nullius, denying Palestinian land claims. #expands (0.98)
• Culture clash arguments mirror colonial terra nullius doctrine against Palestinians #expands (0.98) — Sherene Razack, Casting Out, 227