The court ruled Harvard may keep the daguerreotypes.
Evidence
That euphoria was quickly tempered by another call from Josh. By jumping to the end of the document, I had read one justice’s concurring opinion—but not the court’s decision, which was on the front page. What I missed was the court ruling to allow Harvard to keep the daguerreotypes. — Tamara Lanier, From These Roots, 1301
Categorization
Category: Factual Claims
Related
- Harvard could keep the daguerreotypes while losing on emotional-distress claims (similarity 0.90)
- Harvard falsely denied Agassiz commissioned the daguerreotypes. (similarity 0.85)
- Harvard controlled scholarly use of the daguerreotypes to exclude criticism of Louis Agassiz. (similarity 0.85)
- Harvard asserted ownership of the daguerreotypes without ever stating its basis. (similarity 0.83)
- Seeing the Renty daguerreotype prompted a Harvard student to question the university ownership. (similarity 0.82)
- Harvard excluded the daguerreotypes from its slavery-acknowledgment report (similarity 0.81)
- The daguerreotypes could be classified as fruit or instrumentality of a crime (similarity 0.81)
- Harvard suppressed and erased the independent researcher who uncovered the daguerreotypes’ history (similarity 0.81)
- Harvard controlled the daguerreotypes’ narrative and dismissed Lanier’s kinship claims (similarity 0.81)
- Harvard’s Undergraduate Council unanimously condemned the university’s possession (similarity 0.80)
- Harvard produced no documentary chain of custody for the daguerreotypes (similarity 0.79)
- A court permitted Lanier’s suit against Harvard over the Renty daguerreotypes. (similarity 0.79)
- Harvard spent decades exploiting and sanitizing the daguerreotypes’ history after 1976 (similarity 0.78)
- An individual outsider recognized the daguerreotypes’ historical worth before Harvard did (similarity 0.78)
- Harvard ignored her probate and census evidence linking her to the images (similarity 0.78)