The concept of Asimov’s robot laws requires reevaluation in modern contexts.
Evidence
The more time I spent with Neo, the clearer it became that Asimov’s rulebook needs an update. Call it the Fourth Law: A robot may not surveil my life and ship every detail back to its corporate overlords. — Joanna Stern, I Am Not a Robot- My Year Using AI to…, 808
Categorization
- corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Joanna Stern, I Am Not a Robot- My Year Using AI to…, 808
- XREF: connects to: Ensuring AI captures human intent is now a central computer science problem — Brian Christian, The Alignment Problem, 65; Machines could learn human values by observing behavior instead of being programmed — Brian Christian, The Alignment Problem, 1086; Newtonian science shaped a mechanical worldview of human reason — Richard A. Posner, What Has Pragmatism to Offer Law?, 22 (+3 more)
Broader Connections
- Machines could learn human values by observing behavior instead of being programmed
#qualifies(0.80) — Brian Christian, The Alignment Problem, 1086 - Ensuring AI captures human intent is now a central computer science problem
#qualifies(0.75) — Brian Christian, The Alignment Problem, 65 - Rule-based machine ethics produce unintended emergent consequences
#corroborates(0.70) — , The Braided Reading EPUB, 1591 - Ethical-robot rhetoric is a Trojan horse that lowers moral barriers to killer robots
#complicates(0.50) — Grégoire Chamayou, A Theory of the Drone, 669 - AI systems can fail through instrumentalized self-preservation goals
#expands(0.50) — , The Braided Reading EPUB, 1604