The commission collected elite racial beliefs alongside details contradicting its narratives

Evidence

Vignettes appeared throughout the regional reports and were often cited in the commission’s final summation, but their provenance was never clear. The vignettes read as stories about the needy, but not by them. In many cases they seem not to have been consulted. What the commission, in the end, collected were starkly different forms of knowledge: on the one hand, a compendium of elite beliefs about racial types, and received common sense about Indos and lower-class whites; on the other hand, de- tails of survival and material need that pierced the conventions of the pre- scribed narratives. — Ann Laura Stoler, Along the Archival Grain_ Epistemic…, 912

Categorization

Category: Connection Points

  • XREF: The elite-commonsense vs. recalcitrant-material-detail tension directly parallels the archive-as-epistemic-construction theme in colonial studies.
  • SEED: Essay angle: the colonial commission as an apparatus that simultaneously produced and was disrupted by its own bureaucratic knowledge.

Broader Connections