The capacity for violence is a learned, inheritable skill not a subcultural trait
Evidence
According to Leopoldo Franchetti, the acceptance of violence in Palermo is due, among other things, to the “large number of bravi [thugs] in the service of the lords residing in Palermo and whose descendants have preserved the family tradition” ( 1974: 94, 98). The ability to accept bloodshed, in other words, is not a subcultural characteristic but a specific skill which, like more pacific skills, can be transmitted from one generation to the next. — Diego Gambetta, The Sicilian Mafia The Business of…, 90
Categorization
- DEFINE: Frames the mafia’s violent capacity as transmitted human capital rather than cultural essence — a key analytic move.
- XREF: Connects to the reader’s education-economics work on intergenerational transmission of human capital — violence as family-transmitted skill parallels parental human capital transfer. — connects to: Cooking is a culturally learned skill, not an innate instinct — Joseph Henrich, The Secret of Our Success: How Culture…, 226
- ADDENDUM: The idea of transmitted capacities echoes Coleman’s finding that parental human capital only passes to children via social ties.