The band-enhanced neuron’s timing constrains the band-suppressed neuron’s tuning

Evidence

An extension of the SFIE model was used for the band-suppressed model (Fig. 1 , BS). This model receives the same ascending excitatory input as the band-enhanced model, but it is inhibited by the band-enhanced model (Carney et al. 2015 ; Kim et al. 2015b ). The BMF of the band-enhanced model determines the worst modulation frequency (WMF) for the band-suppressed model. — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 5486

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

Related

• Band-suppressed IC cells derive their suppression from band-enhanced cell inhibition (similarity 0.89)
• Inhibitory-excitatory synaptic timing determines a midbrain neuron’s best modulation frequency. (similarity 0.88)
• Cellular synaptic timing parameters determine a neuron’s preferred modulation frequency (similarity 0.86)
• Synaptic timing between excitation and inhibition sets each inferior-colliculus neuron’s preferred modulation frequency (similarity 0.83)
• Two inhibitory inputs jointly shape the hybrid neuron’s modulation response (similarity 0.83)
• Downstream neurons recode F0 phase-locking information into a rate contrast across frequency channels (similarity 0.80)
• Healthy band-enhanced IC neurons respond between formants not at them (similarity 0.80)
• Healthy band-enhanced midbrain cells encode formants as rate valleys via synchrony capture (similarity 0.80)