The Army could not produce a cost analysis supporting its changed basing decision

Evidence

I contacted Bruce Anderson, a spokesperson for U.S. Army Europe, and asked him why the Army had decided to keep the brigade split between Italy and Germany given that consolidating the 173rd was the explicit justification for creating the base. Anderson replied in an email that European troop reductions had opened unexpected space in Germany. Moving two of the 173rd’s battalions within Germany rather than to Italy, he said, means the Army will save on moving costs, on transportation costs when the battalions need to conduct regular training in Germany, and on closing costs for the two bases being vacated in Germany. … I repeatedly asked Anderson and other Army public affairs officials by telephone and email whether the Army had performed a cost analysis supporting these claims. I asked whether such an analysis had been shared with Congress, and if I could see the cost data. I received no response. — David Vine, Base Nation_ How U.S. Military Bases…, 764

Categorization

Category: Factual Claims

  • QUESTION: Did a cost analysis ever exist? The Army’s refusal to answer leaves this unresolved and worth pursuing.

Broader Connections

  • Top military commanders make basing decisions without access to cost data or alternatives analysis. #expands (0.60) — David Vine, Base Nation_ How U.S. Military Bases…, 809