The archival turn in scholarship predates and is not caused by Derrida’s Archive Fever

Evidence

Both questioned “how people told stories, what they thought a good story was, how they accounted for motive.” In Davis’s notion of â€œïŹction in the archives,” she worked through pardon tales to reveal both the “constraints of the law” and its popular manipulations, both the terms of argumentation and the broader set of literary forms invoked to support or undermine those claims. Still, these were not ethnographies of the archive, but in it. — Ann Laura Stoler, Along the Archival Grain_ Epistemic
, 289 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim
  • XREF: connects to: Emphasis on dramatic reversals obscures muted archival disruptions; Early archival microhistories worked in archives but did not treat them as ethnographic subjects — Ann Laura Stoler, Along the Archival Grain_ Epistemic
, 289; the MOC “The Authority Apparatus: How Textual Orders Make and Unmake Power”

Broader Connections