The 1964 elderly home-sale tax break overwhelmingly benefited white homeowners
Evidence
In 1964, the same year the Civil Rights Act passed, section 121 of the Internal Revenue Code was passed, allowing taxpayers aged sixty-five and up to receive
20,000 in tax-free gain from the sale of their homes regardless of whether or not they purchased a new, more expensive home. (At the time, the median home value was approximately12,000.) Congress’s rationale was that offering a tax break only for upsizing placed a financial burden on the elderly, who might be downsizing and in need of money for retirement. Again, white homeowners were by far the greatest beneficiaries of the new rule. In 1960, almost 71 percent of white Americans between the ages of sixty-five and seventy-four owned homes. — Dorothy A. Brown, Getting to Reparations, 1250
That change set the stage for a series of amendments and exclusions that would transform the way homeownership affected wealth for the rest of the twentieth century. In 1964, the same year the Civil Rights Act passed, section 121 of the Internal Revenue Code was passed, allowing taxpayers aged sixty-five and up to receive
20,000 in tax-free gain from the sale of their homes regardless of whether or not they purchased a new, more expensive home. (At the time, the median home value was approximately12,000.) Congress’s rationale was that offering a tax break only for upsizing placed a financial burden on the elderly, who might be downsizing and in need of money for retirement. Again, white homeowners were by far the greatest beneficiaries of the new rule. In 1960, almost 71 percent of white Americans between the ages of sixty-five and seventy-four owned homes. — Dorothy A. Brown, Getting to Reparations, 1250
Categorization
- XREF: The exemption was triple the median home value — a disproportionate subsidy that tied tax policy to existing intergenerational white wealth.
- corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Dorothy A. Brown, Getting to Reparations: How Building a…, 1250