Tech culture encodes status hierarchies that shape the social software it builds

Evidence

But my interactions made clear that the tech scene had, in fact, a strict social hierarchy. It mattered what company you worked for, whether you were an entrepreneur, and how much attention you received online. I hypothesized that studying the status structure of this community—the people who built virtually all the popular social media applications of the time—would reveal a great deal about how status was built into Web 2.0, and thus illuminate how popular social software may promote inequality rather than counter it. — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update, 19

Categorization

  • XREF: This counters the popular Web 2.0 discourse that social media empowers regular people and flattens hierarchies; connects to critiques of internet egalitarianism in danah boyd and related work. — connects to: Conference travel functions as visible status signaling within tech culture — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 194; Tech status hierarchies are made visible and reinforced through public digital connections — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 202; Informal status behaviors become formalized status affordances when platforms embed them in software — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 260 (+7 more)
  • QUESTION: How exactly does the designers’ own status structure get inscribed into the design of social software? Worth tracing the mechanism as the book unfolds.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 19

Broader Connections