Tacit Christian nationalists can believe in inclusion yet grant it no practical path

Evidence

That’s a tough one, because that’s kind of a … We both live in the South, right? And that’s a traditional thing before a lot of these events. And it is true, it excludes certain people. And in an ideal world, I think there’s some sort of speech, or some sort of thing that’s said that’s non-denominational and it’s more or less a good statement. Is there anything out there like that right now? Probably not. Ideally, everyone gets their fair share and gets to say something, I just don’t think that’s necessarily practical. The answer is yeah, ideally, everyone gets their say and doesn’t feel disrespected. Is there a practical way to implement that? Probably not. Could it happen? Probably not. — Andrew L. Whitehead; Samuel L. Perry, Taking America Back for God, 337

Categorization

• DEFINE: This illustrates the Accommodator category — those who acknowledge exclusion yet see no workable alternative, revealing the category’s self-aware but resigned stance.
• XREF: connects to: Conservatives reject self-determination for some peoples while championing it for others — Yanis Varoufakis, Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism, 1002; Religious minorities become politically suspect when religion ties to national identity; White nationalists feel emboldened to voice their views openly in ordinary settings — Anna Merlan, Republic of Lies, 734

Broader Connections

• Religious minorities become politically suspect when religion ties to national identity #expands (0.82)