Syncretism is a merger while entryism is a takeover

Evidence

“With a more detailed and historical analysis, it becomes evident that the neoliberalism is not singular, but plural. From basis-common elements he knows indeed very various developments. That plurality of neoliberalism is not a weakness, but constitutes a strength in the context of a Hegemony Theory standpoint” (Plehwe and Walpen 1999, 206). — Philip Mirowski & Dieter Plehwe (eds.), The Road from Mont Pèlerin, 1014 (#complicates, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Calling a mixed-text corpus ‘syncretistic’ wrongly implies coexistence rather than takeover. — L. P. Harvey, Muslims in Spain, 1500 to 1614, 1234; Assimilation can match integration’s benefits when both groups prefer it; Neoliberalism’s internal plurality is strategic strength, not weakness — Philip Mirowski & Dieter Plehwe (eds.), The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making…, 1014 (+3 more)

Broader Connections

• Neoliberalism’s internal plurality is strategic strength, not weakness #complicates (0.72) — Philip Mirowski & Dieter Plehwe (eds.), The Road from Mont Pèlerin, 1014