Swipe-era romance is not reducible to a financialized homo economicus logic

Evidence

I critically review sociological framings of modern intimacy that project a neoliberal romantic subject, haunted by the hyperrational figure of homo economicus. I challenge the view that contemporary intimate bonds are upended by the financialization of sex and intimacy and the ascendancy of an entrepreneurial logic of choice. — Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou, Speculative Communities, 37

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s stated goal of showing speculation migrated into dating and self-presentation, and to the critique of homo economicus as an explanatory figure. — connects to: Neoliberal critique alone cannot explain speculation in modern dating — Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou, Speculative Communities: Living With…, 224; Online dating markets frame romance as return on affective investment — Wendy Brown, Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s…, 50; Money and intimacy cannot be disentangled from each other. — Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou, Speculative Communities: Living With…, 216 (+5 more)
  • yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Neoliberal critique alone cannot explain speculation in modern dating — Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou, Speculative Communities: Living With…, 224; Online dating markets frame romance as return on affective investment — Wendy Brown, Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s…, 50; Money and intimacy cannot be disentangled from each other. — Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou, Speculative Communities: Living With…, 216 (+5 more)

Broader Connections