Surveillance power erodes democracy from within rather than confronting it directly

Evidence

The rise of instrumentarianism follows the path of “illuminating events” that, as Hannah Arendt writes, reveal “a beginning in the past which had hitherto been hidden.” It is in the nature of instrumentarian power to operate remotely and move in stealth. It does not grow through terror, murder, the suspension of democratic institutions, massacre, or expulsion. Instead, it grows through declaration, self-authorization, rhetorical misdirection, euphemism, and the quiet, audacious backstage moves specifically crafted to elude awareness as it replaces individual freedom with others’ knowledge and replaces society with certainty. It does not confront democracy but rather erodes it from within, eating away at the human capabilities and self-understanding required to sustain a democratic life. — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 1211

Categorization

  • XREF: Contrasts sharply with totalitarian models of power via terror and mass violence; resonates with Foucault’s diffuse disciplinary power and Arendt’s own work on totalitarianism. — connects to: Surveillance of whole populations weakens democracy while failing to prevent terror; Racialized group surveillance weakens democracy and expands state power — Saher Selod, Forever Suspect_ Racialized…, 485; Surveillance capitalism’s behavioral modification creates heteronomous individuals contrary to democratic ideals — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 1003 (+4 more)

Broader Connections