Surveillance harms by invading the self’s space on another’s behalf.

Evidence

The reason both traditional surveillance and datafied tracking conflict with notions of freedom derives from something common to both: their invasion of the basic space of the self on behalf of an external power. — Nick Couldry & Ulises A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection, 471

Categorization

  • XREF: This unified theory of self-space invasion runs parallel to the attention/surveillance schools’ account of platform power over user agency. — connects to: External surveillance becomes internalized as self-imposed bodily discipline — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 512; Surveillance erodes interpersonal trust by removing the right to act without it — Nick Couldry & Ulises A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection: How Data Is…, 503; Compliance with surveillance regimes can threaten the minimal integrity of selfhood — Nick Couldry & Ulises A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection: How Data Is…, 501 (+10 more)

Broader Connections