Suppressing our emotional response to environmental disaster enables our own destruction

Evidence

Philosopher Joanna Macy writes of the oblivion we manufacture for ourselves to keep us from looking environmental problems straight in the eye. She quotes R. J. Clifton, a psychologist studying human response to catastrophe: “Suppression of our natural responses to disaster is part of the disease of our time. The refusal to acknowledge these responses causes a dangerous splitting. It divorces our mental calculations from our intuitive, emotional, and biological embeddedness in the matrix of life. That split allows us passively to acquiesce in the preparations for our own demise.” — Robin Wall Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass, 1195

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly connects to the Eco-Justice course theme of listening/observation-as-method being severed by instrumental rationality. — connects to: Distant future people fail to arouse the empathy that would curb environmental harm; Victims’ rational survival choices can become tools of their own destruction — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 349; Knowledge of environmental harm breeds despair, not action — Robin Wall Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom,…, 1202 (+2 more)
  • SHARE: Worth sending to someone working on climate psychology or grief work — Clifton’s ‘dangerous splitting’ diagnosis condenses a whole literature.
  • DEEPTHINKING: The claim that emotional acknowledgement itself is an ecological survival mechanism, and that its suppression is ‘the disease of our time,’ is a dense paradigm-level insight pairing affect theory with catastrophe.

Broader Connections