Sudanese resistance and poor extraction doomed Egyptâs gold-mining venture
Evidence
Al-TahtawĂŻ also wished for the extraction of the Sudanâs mineral resources, particularly its fabled gold deposits, to help Egypt gain entry into the international metals market, then dominated by Russia, Austria, and South America. This was important to Muhammad
AlĂŻ, al-TahtawĂŻ wrote, who took it upon himself to visit FazughlĂŻ in the Sudan in 1838 to see how the gold mines he had commissioned were functioning. Al-TahtawĂŻ compares Africa to Americaâ"li bilĂ€din ifriqiyatin laha shibhun bi-amrĂŻka"â in its resources, and it was for its resources generally that MuhammadAlĂŻ invested so much manpower and money. But it all came to nothing. The French engineers hired by the viceroy could not agree on the right system of extraction, there was little gold, and the inhabitants of the FazughlĂŻ region repeatedly and successfully attacked the enterprise.The raids of these `abid (slaves), as al-TahtawĂŻ called them, finally caused the enterprise to be abandoned. â Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_âŠ, 240
Categorization
- SHARE: Share with anyone studying African resistance to early extractive colonialism â a concrete case where local raids, not European engineering disputes, shut down the enterprise.
- CANDY: The would-be gold rush into Sudan failed partly because the âslavesâ local inhabitants kept successfully attacking the mine â a sharp reversal of the extraction fantasy.