Successfully adopting Gramsci’s framework created new problems that forced Hall to move beyond it

Evidence

There are problems that Gramsci’s gains present to one, and then you have to look elsewhere, which forces you to wrestle on a different terrain. — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 269

Categorization

Category: Factual Claims

• XREF: Hall’s trajectory — Marxism as problem, then Althusser, then Gramsci — is the intellectual arc the reader wants to map.

Related

• Adopting a theoretical framework imports its unsolved problems too (similarity 0.89)
• Adopting Gramsci let Hall say things Marxism could not before (similarity 0.84)
• Gramsci’s concepts stay embedded in conjunctures rather than aiming at theoretical purity. (similarity 0.82)
• Gramsci practices an open Marxism that develops Marx beyond orthodoxy. (similarity 0.82)
• Conjunctural analysis of concrete situations defines mature Marxist method (similarity 0.81)
• Gramsci’s theory is activist practice within broad Marxism, not orthodoxy. (similarity 0.81)
• Hall’s Marxism fused Althusser read through Gramsci into a non-reductionist framework (similarity 0.80)
• Gramsci’s concepts operate on Marxist terrain aimed at political practice (similarity 0.80)
• Gramsci’s Marxism is open and supplies concepts classical Marxism lacked (similarity 0.80)
• Theoretical perspectives are applied, not transferred, to new problem-fields. (similarity 0.80)
• Post-Marxist theory emerged to correct Marxism’s economism and reductionism (similarity 0.80)
• Althusser’s reproduction theory remains more functionalist than Gramsci’s despite nods to class struggle (similarity 0.80)
• Althusser’s theory is more functionalist than he intends compared to Gramsci. (similarity 0.80)
• Gramsci and Laclau reconceived ideology as a terrain of struggle rather than dominant cement. (similarity 0.79)
• Gramsci adds concepts classical Marxism lacked for explaining modern society. (similarity 0.79)