Sublation has a pre-Hegelian history rather than being a idiosyncratic tic

Evidence

If we are always to stigmatize the Aufhebung as an idiosyncrasy – the ‘tic’ in Hegel’s thought – aren’t we forgetting that this structure has always been at work in the history of philosophy? Aren’t we forgetting that the Aufhebung itself has a history, brought together and elaborated by Hegel? In its movement, the dialectical sublation is not a frozen process whose modalities are fixed once and for all, remaining detached and separate from everything it sets into motion. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 1008