Studying conspiracy theories does not itself confer conspiratorial skill

Evidence

You might think that we are ace conspirators. After four or so years of studying stratagems, subterfuge, and schemes—real and imagined—one could be expected to acquire a practical facility with such arts. Alas, the truth must out: we are deplorably deficient in this regard. Events have re­ peatedly mocked our master plans, we labor quite openly for the common good, and the present work is not remotely the product of a small group. While this may handicap our credibility as conspirators, we flatter our­ selves to think it improves our objectivity as scholars. — Joseph E. Uscinski and Joseph M. Parent, American Conspiracy Theories, 22

Categorization

• recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source
• XREF: connects to: Collaboration so seamless it defies accounting invites conspiratorial explanation — Joseph E. Uscinski and Joseph M. Parent, American Conspiracy Theories, 26; Media-studies scholars can cross from studying conspiracy theories to spreading them — Anna Merlan, Republic of Lies, 404; Studying conspiracy beliefs itself triggers defensive backlash from believers. — Joseph E. Uscinski and Joseph M. Parent, American Conspiracy Theories, 154

Broader Connections

• Studying conspiracy beliefs itself triggers defensive backlash from believers. #qualifies (0.82) — Joseph E. Uscinski and Joseph M. Parent, American Conspiracy Theories, 154
• Media-studies scholars can cross from studying conspiracy theories to spreading them #expands (0.80) — Anna Merlan, Republic of Lies, 404