Structuralist social analysis mistakes ongoing praxis for fixed synchronic being.

Evidence

Such structures, which the followers of Lévi-Strauss take as the object of their research, are here by Sartre subjected to a phenomenological analysis which reveals them to be a kind of optical illusion: they are, indeed, the optical illusion of the outsider, seeing the group not as praxis or action in course but as a type of being or constituted object. They are the hypostasis, along synchronic lines, of what is in reality a diachronic process. — Fredric Jameson, Marxism and Form, 531

Categorization

  • XREF: Sartre’s critique of Lévi-Strauss prefigures the ‘history vs. structure’ debate that Jameson’s own Postmodernism stages; links to the reader’s earlier engagement with structuralism. — connects to: Structuralism decentered individual agency that culturalism treated as authentic; Structuralism inverts culturalism’s claim by making experience an effect of categories; Social relations crystallize into fixed external forms that cannot keep pace with inner life — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 778 (+1 more)
  • SEED: Angle: how the structuralist chart — kinship maps, networks, systems — hypostatizes what dialectical criticism insists is a becoming. Could write on ‘the optical illusion of the outsider’ as a theory of how all systems-analysis flattens time.

Broader Connections