States resisting economic control become targets of invasive violence.

Evidence

Falling outside the reach of control through commerce, debt regulation, structural adjustment, and cultural or ideological suasion, they are subjected to increasingly invasive measures of regulation. Their supposed racial distinction renders them vulnerable to external imposition, restraint, and ultimately violence. — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race, 1809

Categorization

• XREF: The causation runs from economic resistance to racialized-coded invasive violence — relevant to testing whether threatened-privilege mobilization follows refusal of imposed order rather than mere contact. — connects to: State expansion paradoxically reduces effective control and increases reliance on violence — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 1726; Neoliberal market freedom required state violence to enforce submission to the market — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights…, 328; Counter-violence can prise open restrictive structures and create new possibilities (+2 more)

Broader Connections

• State expansion paradoxically reduces effective control and increases reliance on violence #complicates (0.85) — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 1726
• Neoliberal market freedom required state violence to enforce submission to the market #expands (0.85) — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market, 328
• Neoliberalism resorts to violent enforcement when local socialities reject its order #expands (0.85) — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race, 1887
• Resistance to neoliberal racial management triggers more invasive state control #corroborates (0.85) — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race, 1803
• Counter-violence can prise open restrictive structures and create new possibilities #complicates (0.75)