State surveillance renders all approved and vilified identities equally fragile

Evidence

In deciding to flee rather than participate in a rushed, unaccountable judicial process that is already loaded against him, Raza embraces his provisionality and begins a process of ā€œunbecomingā€ (308), ditching the documents that make him legal but traceable. He is forced into an awareness that all identities, approved and vilified, exist only by dint of global technologies of control: ā€œOne phone call … and he would enter data banks the world over as a suspected terrorist. His bank accounts frozen. His mother’s phone tapped. His emails and phone logs, his Internet traffic, his credit card receipts: no longer the markers of his daily life … but a different kind of evidence entirelyā€ (307). — Peter Morey, Islamophobia and the Novel, 434

Categorization

  • XREF: The ā€˜one phone call’ data-bank passage is a precise instrument for reading Changez’s paranoia in The Reluctant Fundamentalist and how biometric data structures belong to the surveillance apparatus.
  • DEEPTHINKING: The point that approved and vilified identities exist only by global technologies of control — identity itself becomes contingent on surveillance — is a dense, paradigm-level observation.