Standardized prepackaged curricula suppress learners’ critical thinking about their own experience

Evidence

A second important role for critical pedagogues is the challenge to resist techno-bureaucratic techniques and the ideological demands of the cult of efficiency (Collins, 1991; Giroux, 2009). Collins (1991) offers a stern warning to educators about the “technicist obsession” in pedagogical practice which reduces learning to “situations managed by technical formulations, such as standardized pre-packaged curricula and preconceived needs assessment instruments” put together by experts (p. 5). Collins further warns that such deficit practices—the technical planning by competency-strategists and packaging of instruction based on simplistic behavioral objectives—get in the way of individual learners’ ability to think critically, and to evaluate everyday experiences on their own account. — James D. Kirylo (ed.), Reinventing Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 191

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the ‘craft and method’ corpus threads about how systemic structure suppresses individual agency (e.g., administrative techniques overriding knowledge). — connects to: Exam-driven schooling makes students resist learning beyond the syllabus — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished
, 1671; Well-intentioned teachers silence students through curriculum and withheld recognition — James D. Kirylo (ed.), Reinventing Pedagogy of the Oppressed:
, 728; Curriculum that conflicts with student values can silence and disconnect those students — James D. Kirylo (ed.), Reinventing Pedagogy of the Oppressed:
, 740 (+7 more)

Broader Connections